8/05/2011

Croatia: Children`s Book With Gay Characters Presented

14/04/2009

Zagreb readership will have the opportunity of encountering the children`s book “Zvijeri plisane”  (meaning Stuffed Monsters) which has raised wind because of its homosexual characters. The book does not include a mother and a father, but Doris and her girlfriend.
The authors says that the reason for writing this book has nothing to do with his sexual orientation.
- No, I`m not homosexual, I have never had such an experience, this is not my reason to write this book. I`ve written about aliens, therefore what is that supposed to mean – author Zoran Krusvar said.
- If there are 5-10 percent people with homosexual preferences in the world, the important this is to have the same percentage of representation in literature. Furthermore, children need to be informed at a certain point – Zoran Krusvar added.
In his story “Zvijeri plisane”, the stuffed animals start their adventure forced to change their owner. None of the animals have sexual insignia, apart from the turtle which wants to be a squirrel and gives the innuendo of transgender persons. The initial owner of the toys, Doris, has a girlfriend and the story ends with a happy end.
- We are not all the same and it is very important to develop tolerance towards others. The theme of homosexuality in this book is in the background, it is not intrusive – it only promotes tolerance. There are physiological differences in the brains of homosexual and heterosexual persons, they are just different.
Will the children understand?
Although he is pleased with the story he has written in a month, Krusvar claims that it many not have been perfectly written for children, seeing how this was his first attempt in this  genre.
Children`sunderstanding of this book depends on their age, the older ones might understand everything, while Krusvar did not wish to guess about the understanding of the younger audience.
- There is no text in Croatia which would introduce children to information on homosexual persons, this is necessary information. When something is new, it can be controversial, but when other examples follow, it is no longer a problem. During the middle of last century, Americans had problems with integrating African-Americans into society, and now, they have an African-American president – Krusvar concludes.
We do not need what is not in nature and God’s laws
Totally expectedly, the conservative HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) member Andrija Hebrang, who has already publicly said that a child cannot be brought up well by a mother alone, was also not impressed with the “mum + mum” variant, or “dad + dad”, and considers the distribution of the book amongst the school population to be inappropriate:
“That is unallowable from pedagogic and moral reasons, because it imposes a public opinion of unnatural relationship in the community. It is also illegal” says Hebrang.
His party colleague Nedjeljka Klaric was even harsher, and said that it violates God’s laws:
“That is totally inappropriate. A children needs a positive identification of the mother and father. I do not know in which way the child could do this in a same-sex union. When you ask me about same-sex marriages and their rights to be parents, I am against what is absent in nature and in God’s laws. That is against God and that book should be banned”.
Mrsic: I vote for same-sex marriages
Mirando Mrsic from SDP (Social Democratic Party) considers that politics should not decide on this, but the experts, according to the good of the children:
“Absolutely in all of that the good of the children must be looked at. First the experts must speak their opinion if the book should be distributed amongst children. We already know that children brought up in a same-sex parenting environment do not have tendencies for same-sex sexual relationships. I think those people should be allowed to live how they want, and the legalization of same-sex marriages needs a national consensus. Personally I would vote for”.
Ratko Gajica from SDSS (Independent Democratic Serbian Party) agrees that the book is a “cute spark”.
“As far as parenting in a same-sex union, I am against all prohibitions, let the people have their will and arrange their lives as they like. This can violate some usual stereotypes, but if the law and morals are not violated, let them do what they want.
The SDP member has already publicly advocated for gay right on many occasions. Sime Lucin considers that a book that advocates “gay is okay” is totally necessary:
“Certainly from youth the children need to be educated that gay unions are not anything unnatural. Only that way can we reduce homophobia, and we are an “envious” homophobic society. Unfortunately, since the last nine years when there has been more talk about the rights of the gay population in Croatia, it has pushed homophobia into the public domain. I do not think the Church is the problem here, it has its doctrines and I do not have anything against them promoting them. However, the state institutions are the problem, which should be secular, which do not look at the greater benefit of the society. Now we all are disgusted by the underage pregnancies in Great Britain, as if they do not occur in Croatia”.

Ajova legalizovala gej brakove

05/04/2009

Vrhovni sud američke države Ajova legalizovao je gej brakove u toj državi.
Kao rezultat tajnog glasanja, sudije su izjavile: „Zakon koji limitira građanski brak na uniju između muškarca i žene nije u skladu sa Ustavom države Ajova, koji garantuje ravnopravnost.“
Parnica Varnum protiv Briena, u kojoj šest istopolnih parova tuži matičara Timothija Briena jer je 2005. godine odbio da venča istopolne parove. Oni su pred sudom izazvali državni zakon koji kaže da brak mogu da sklope samo muškarac i žena.
Lambda Legal je krajem 2005. godine podnela tužbu i ime tih parova, tvrdeći da uskraćivanje braka istopolnim parovima krši Ustav države Ajova. U avgustu 2007. godine sud je doneo odluku da je uskraćivanje prava na brak istopolnim parovima protivustavno.
Nakon dve godine tu odluku je potvrdio Vrhovni sud i Ajova je postala treća američka država koja je legalizovala gej brakove.

Švedska legalizovala gej brakove

Nakon šest sati debate, velikom većinom glasova švedski parlament je legalizovao istopolne brakove.
Šest od sedam parlamentarnih partija je podržalo predlog zakona koji rodno neutralno definiše brak, odnosno definiše ga kao zajednicu dve osobe.
Samo je Demohrišćanska stranka bila protiv zakona. Yvonne Andersson iz ove partije je saopštila da oni žele da održe „nekoliko hiljada godina stari koncept braka“.
Evon Frid iz Levičarske partije, koja podržava ovaj zakon, izjavila je da ovo nije negativna promena, već pozitivna.
Zakon je izglasan sa 261 glasom za, 22 protiv i 16 uzdržanih.
Zakon će stupiti na snagu 1. maja i zameniće zakon iz 1995. godine koji je dozvoljavao istopolnim parovima da registruju partnerstvo. Parovi koji su registrovali partnerstvo mogu da zadrže taj status ili da zatraže promenu u brak.
Soren Juras, predsednik švedske LGBT federacije RFSL, izjavio je da je ovo velika pobeda.
Ova promena za sada neće uticati na crkvene bračne ceremonije.

Srbija: Usvojen Zakon o zabrani diskriminacije

http://www.mondo.rs/v2/tekst.php?vest=129098

26.3.2009.

Skupština Srbije završila je danas rad, a prethodno su poslanici
opozicije napustili skupštinsku salu nezadovoljni što u vreme
predviđeno za postavljanje poslaničkih pitanja nisu došli premijer
Mirko Cvetković i većina ministara. Skupština je danas usvojila Zakon
o zabrani diskriminacije koji treba da uspostavi sveobuhvatan i
integralan sistem zaštite od diskriminacije.

Za zakon, koji je izazvao burne reakcije u javnosti i koji je bio
povlačen iz skupštinske procedure na zahtev verskih zajednica, glasalo
je 127 poslanika iz vladajuće koalicije i Liberalno demokratske
partije.

Protiv zakona glasalo je 59 poslanika, uglavnom opozicionih stranaka,
ali i poslanici iz Jedinstvene Srbije koji su deo vladajuće koalicije,
kao i jedan poslanik Partije ujedinjenih penzionera. Poslanici Srpske
napredne stranke nisu učestvovali u glasanju.

Zakon zabranjuje diskriminaciju po bilo kom osnovu, a naročito po
osnovu rase, pola, nacionalne pripadnosti, društvenog porekla,
rođenja, veroispovest i s obzirom na zdravstveno stanje.

Diskriminacija je, prema zakonu, zabranjena i po osnovu političkog ili
drugog uverenja, imovnog stanja, kulture, jezika, starosti i psihičkog
ili fizičkog invaliditeta.

Njime je utvrđena opšta zabranu diskriminacije na načelu jednakosti i
propisuje oblike i slučajeve diskriminacije, kao i postupke zaštite od
diskriminacije.

Zakon ustanovljava poverenika za zaštitu ravnopravnosti kao
samostalnog državnog organa, nezavisanog u obavljanju poslova
utvrđenih zakonom.

Nadležnost poverenika je da ukazuje na nedozvoljene oblike ponašanja i
da izriče preventivne mere opomene.

Poverenika bira Skupština na period od pet godina, na predlog
skupštinskog odbora nadležnog za ustavna pitanja. Svaka poslanička
grupa ima pravo da predloži Odboru kandidata za poverenika.

Za poverenika može biti izabran državljanin Srbije koji je diplomirani
pravnik, ima najmanje deset godina iskustva na pravnim poslovima u
oblasti zaštite ljudskih prava.

Zakon predviđa i sudsku zaštitu od diskriminacije, a propisano je da
su kazne prekršajne, u skladu sa Zakonom o prekršajima. Zakon utvrđuje
da svako ima pravo da ga nadležni sudovi i drugi organi javne vlasti
Srbije efikasno štite od svih oblika diskriminacije.

Svi su jednaki i uživaju jednak položaj i jednaku pravnu zaštitu, bez
obzira na lična svojstva, a svako je dužan da poštuje načelo
jednakosti, odnosno zabranu diskriminacije.

Oblici diskriminacije su neposredna i posredna diskriminacija, kao i
povreda načela jednakih prava i obaveza, pozivanje na odgovornost,
udruživanje radi vršenja diskriminacije, govor mržnje i uznemiravanje
i ponižavajuće postupanje.

Novčane kazne za kršenje ovog zakona iznose od 10.000 dinara do
100.000 dinara.

Taj zakonski predlog povučen je iz skupštinske procedure 4. marta, dan
pre nego što je trebalo da se nađe na prvoj sednici redovnog prolećnog
zasedanja republičkog parlamenta. U skupštinsku proceduru vraćen je
nakon što su razmotrene primedbe verskih zajednica.

Ključne primedbe verskih zajednica bili članovi 18. i 21, koji se
odnose na zabranu diskriminacije u pogledu verskih prava i seksualne
orijentacije.

Kako je rečeno u Vladi nakon razmatranja primedbi odbačene su primedbe
verskih zajednica koje bi promenile karakter zakona, a prihvaćene su
pojedine sugestije i neki termini su precizirani.

U članu 18. je precizirano da se neće smatrati diskriminacijom
postupanje sveštenika i verskih službenika koje je u skladu sa
doktrinom, uverenjima ili ciljevima crkava i verskih zajednica
registrovanih u skladu sa zakonom.

Iz člana 21. izbrisan je stav tri koji se odnosi na transseksualce,
jer je njegova suština sadržana u drugim odredbama istog predloga u
kojima je predviđena zabrana diksriminacije prema rodnom identitetu i
seksualnoj orijentaciji. [prim. moderatora: ovo nije tačno. iz člana
21. izbačeno je u potpunosti svojstvo rodnog identiteta, pored stava
3., te tako ne postoji posebna zakonska zaštita za transrodne,
interseksualne, a ni za pre-operativno transseksualne osobe. ni jedan
od prihvaćenih amandmana se nije bavio vraćanjem ovog svojstva nazad u
zakon. utoliko, zakon štiti privatnost i pravo na izjašnjavanje samo
svojstva seksualne orijentacije, a zaštita post-operativno
transseksualnih osoba je zamišljena članom 20. koji štiti od
diskriminacije po polnoj osnovi ili zbog promene pola. na ovaj način,
doneti zakon je minimalni stepen zaštite lgbt populacije, i u mnogim
situacijama neće biti moguće ga sprovesti. takođe, zakon i dalje
dvostruko definiše seksualnu orijentaciju: kao orijentaciju i kao
opredeljenje - u članu: 13, kao i obrazloženju koje je pisao
zakonodavac, što dovodi u pitanje poznavanje materije od strane
zakonodavca - figures, right?]

U članu 21, koji je izazvao najviše polemike, navodi se da je
seksualna orijentacija privatna stvar i da niko ne može biti pozvan da
se javno izjasni o svojoj seksualnoj orijentaciji. Svako ima pravo da
se izjasni o svojoj seksualnoj orijentaciji, a diskriminatorsko
postupanje zbog takvog izjašnjavanja je zabranjeno, piše u tom članu.

Zakon je jedan od uslova za stavljanje Srbije na belu šengen listu, a
nadzor nad sprovođenjem zakona vrši ministarstvo nadležno za ljudska i
manjinska prava.

Zakon će na snagu stupiti osmog dana od objavljivanja u Službenom
glasniku osim članova koji se odnose na poverenika, koji će se
primenjivati od 1. januara 2010. godine.

Na Zakon o zabrani diskriminacije podneto je ukupno 446 amandmana, od
kojih je Vlada Srbije usvojila šest amandmana.

Najviše amandmana, oko 400, podneli su poslanici Srpske radikalne
stranke (SRS).

Poslanici Skupštine završili u sredu pre ponoći dvodnevnu raspravu u
pojedinostima o zakonu tokom koje su poslanici u predviđenom vremenu
koje dozvoljava poslovnik razmotrili amandmane, a od kojih je vlada
prihvatila šest.

Ministar za ljudska i manjinska prava Svetozar Čiplić je, zaključujući
višednevnu raspravu, rekao je da je ovo jedan od reformskih zakona
koji će biti donet sa razlogom.

On je ponovio da je član 18 predložen uz saglasnost crkava i verskih
zajendica, a osporavani član 21 ne daje novo već štiti postojeće pravo
iz Ustava.

"Svi znamo da je Srbija jaka koliko je ljudska i čovečna, a ovaj zakon
tome doprinosi," rekao je ministar.

Poslanici vladajućih stranaka, osim Jedinstvene Srbije, i poslanici
opozicione Liberalno demokratske partije najavili su da će podržati
zakon jer je on jedan od najznačajnijih propisa koje parlament usvaja
i kojim se garantuje zaštita i jednakost svih osetljivih grupa.

Tokom rasprave poslanik PUPS Konstantin Arsenović najavio je da neće
glasati za zakon.

Ostale opozicione stranke najavile su da neće podržati zakon, navodeći
da je loš i neprimenljiv, a njihove kritike bile su naročito usmerene
na rešenja koja se odnose na seksualnu orjentaciju, tvrdeći da se time
favorizuju određene grupe u društvu na štetu većine.

Suština amandmana SRS, DSS, NS i SNS odnosila se na brisanje ili
izmenu odredbi o pravu da se slobodno izražava seksualna orjentacija
što je definisano članom 21.

Ta rešenja najviše su kritikovali radikali navodeći da je
homoseksulanost devijacija koja se ne može stavljati u istu ravan sa
drugim oblicima diskriminacije u društvu.

Ovaj propis predstavlja i poslednji pravni uslov za stavljanje Srbije
na belu šengen listu.

Hungarian Government Approves New Registered Partnership Bill

Budapest, February 11, 2009 – The Hungarian Government has approved today a new bill on registered partnership. The bill replaces a previous law on registered partnership that was struck down by the Constitutional Court in December 2008 just weeks before its supposed entry into force. As opposed to the previous version, the new bill introduces the institution of registered partnership only for same sex couples, however, it also introduces a different scheme of domestic partnership registration for both same sex and different sex couples. Support for the bill in the Parliament is still an open question.
Two months ago, on December 15, 2008 the Hungarian Constitutional Court ruled that the law on registered partnership adopted by the Hungarian Parliament a year earlier was unconstitutional. The Court found that the solution chosen by the legislator – i.e. creating an institution similar to marriage for both same sex and different sex couples – duplicates the institution of marriage for different sex couples, and thus contradicts the special protection of marriage enshrined in the Constitution. On the other hand the Court also held that same sex couples have the right to an institution similar to marriage. Within a day Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány instructed the Minister of Justice and Law Enforcement to prepare a new bill on registered partnership taking into account the opinion of the Court. After consultations with various LGBT organizations, the Ministry prepared a new bill that has been approved by the Government today.
The new bill retains much of the content of the previous bill with one exception: the institution of registered partnership would only be available to same sex couples. Establishment and dissolution of registered partnerships would be the same as for marriage, and registered partners would be entitled to most of the rights available for married couples. Notable exceptions are the right to take the partners' name and the right to adopt children. Besides introducing registered partnerships for same sex couples, the bill would also introduce a new scheme for registering domestic partnerships. Unlike registered partnership, this new opportunity would not grant any new rights or duties to couples cohabiting without marriage, but would only make it easier for them to prove the existence of such a relationship. This second registration scheme would be available to both same sex and different sex couples.
Although the Government fully supports the new bill, its adoption by the Parliament is still an open question. Hungary currently has a minority government after the liberals left the government coalition early last year. Conservative opposition parties heavily criticized the previous bill on the account that it introduced same sex marriage under a different name. It is yet to be seen whether their position has changed as a result of the Constitutional Court declaring such an institution a constitutional right. Based on "parliamentary mathematics" the bill has a high chance of being passed: governing parties hardly ever vote against proposals by their own government and the liberals fully support the new bill. It is, however, very hard to predict how delicate negotiations involved in running a minority government will affect voting on the bill.

First gay premier takes helm in Iceland


February 2, 2009

Iceland's political parties have reached an agreement that will
give the country its first female prime minister and the world its first
openly gay leader.
Johnanna Sigurdardottir is a former flight attendant and union leader.

Johnanna Sigurdardottir is a former flight attendant and union leader.

Johanna Sigurdardottir, 66, will lead the government when it is sworn in at
6 p.m. (1 p.m. Eastern) on Sunday, her political advisor Hrannar Arnarsson
told CNN via e-mail.

A former flight attendant who entered politics via the union movement,
Sigurdardottir was minister of social affairs and social security in the
outgoing Cabinet, which resigned Monday.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/02/01/iceland.pm/




Serbian celebrities for gay rights

06/01/2009

Serbian celebrities for gay rights

"Queeria center" from Belgrade presented the calendar for the year 2009, called „Dreams".
Message of this year's calendar is the cooperation among people and realization of their own dreams through overcoming boundaries and borders.
Photos for this year's calendar were taken in Belgrade (Serbia), Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and Zagreb (Croatia). Models on the calendar are public figures, but also queer activists and friends of Queeria.
Among the models are: Lena Bogdanovic (actress), DJ Marko Nastic, Maja Uzelac (director and TV personality), Milica Tomic (artist), Aleksandar Macasev (designer), Ida Prester (Croatian singer and TV personality), Gordan Bosanac (queer activist from Croatia), activists from Bosnian LGBT group "Q", and many others.
This calendar is an autonomous project of Queeria center which has the goal to create wide public support for the queer community in Serbia. The concept of this calendar is to bring celebrities and human and gay rights activists together in promoting queer culture.
So far Queeria center has published three calendars: "Friends" (2007), "Freedom" (2008) and "Dreams" (2009). Some of the biggest Serbian stars have been the models for this calendar, for example: actress Mirjana Karanovic, actor Svetozar Cvetkovic, MTV award winner and singer Aleksandra Kovac, writer Marko Vidojkovic, playwright Biljana Srbljanovic, writer Srdjan Valjarevic, female painter Biljana Cincarevic, drag queens Viva La Diva and Diva Grazia, human right layer Biljana Kovacevic Vuco...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01UUGv_qT3w

Srbija osudila nasilje po osnovu seksualne orijentacije i rodnog identiteta

Saopštenjem Generalne skupštine UN
66 država potvrdilo prava za sve

Njujork, 18. decembar

U Generalnoj skupštini UN, 66 država[1], a među njima i Srbija, podržalo je saopštenje kojim se potvrđuje da međunarodna zaštita ljudskih prava uključuje seksualnu orijentaciju i rodni identitet. To je prvi put da je izjava, kojom se osuđuju povrede ljudskih prava lezbejki, gej muškaraca, biseksualnih i transrodnih osoba, predstavljena Generalnoj skupštini.
Saopštenjem se osuđuju ubistva, tortura i hapšenja LGBT osoba ali i lišavanje ekonomskih, društvenih i kulturnih prava, uključujući i pravo na zdravstvenu zaštitu. Zemlje potpisnice podstiču sve nacije da „promovišu i štite ljudska prava svih osoba, bez obzira na njihovu seksualnu orijentaciju i rodni identitet,“ i da ukinu sve krivične kazne zbog seksualne orijentacije ili rodnog identiteta.

Iako ovo saopštenje nije pravno obavezujuće – ono šalje snažnu poruku nedeljivosti ljudskih prava i prepoznavanja LGBT osoba kao ravnopravnih i jednakih. Labris – organizacija za lezbejska ljudska prava, izražava zadovoljstvo što se Srbija, juče, našla među onim državama koje su branile pravo na seksualnu orijentaciju i osudile nasilje i diskriminaciju po ovom osnovu.

Saopštenje je dobilo podršku sa pet kontinenata, uključujući i šest afričkih nacija a Argentina je pročitala saopštenje pred Generalnom skupštinom. Među potpisnicama se, između ostalih, nisu našle Amerika, Rusija i Kina. Ipak, države koje su podržale ovo saopštenje, prevazišle su snažan otpor grupe zemalja koje redovno pokušavaju da blokiraju pažnju UN-a po pitanju kršenja prava na osnovu seksualne orijentacije i rodnog identiteta. I Vatikan je bio među onima koji su se snažno protivili ovom saopštenju. Ovakav stav Katoličke crkve je izazvao oštre kritike organizacija za ljudska prava širom sveta pa je Vatikan ipak pozvao na ukidanje krivičnih kazni za istopolno orijentisane osobe.
Potpisnice Saopštenja Generalne skupštine su:
Albanija, Andora, Argentina, Jermenija, Australija, Austrija, Belgija, Bolivija, Bosna i Hercegovina, Brazil, Bugarska, Kanada, Kape Verde, Centralnoafrička Republika, Čile, Kolumbija, Hrvatska, Kuba, Kipar, Češka Republika, Danska, Ekvador, Estonija, Finska, Francuska, Gabon, Gruzija, Nemačka, Grčka, Gvineja Bisao, Mađarska, Island, Irska, Izrael, Italija, Japan, Letonija, Lihtenštajn, Litvanija, Luksemburg, Malta, Mauricijus, Meksiko, Crna Gora, Nepal, Holandija, Novi Zeland, Nikaragva, Norveška, Paragvaj, Poljska, Portugalija, Rumunija, San Marino, Sao Tome i Principe, Srbija, Slovačka, Slovenija, Španija, Švedska, Švajcarska, FNRJ Makedonija, Timor-Leste, V.Britanija, Urugvaj i Venecuela.

66 countries back UN statement for LGBT human rights

18 December 2008

Sixty-six countries signed a joint statement in support of LGBT human
rights, which was tabled at the United Nations General Assembly today
(18 December 2008).

The statement, which includes a call for the decriminalisation of
homosexuality worldwide. was read by Argentina.

"This was history in the making. Totally ground-breaking. It is the
first time that the UN General Assembly has been presented with a
statement in support of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)
human rights. Securing this statement at the UN is the result of an
inspiring collective global effort by many LGBT and human rights
organisations. Our collaboration, unity and solidarity have won us
this success," said Peter Tatchell of the British LGBT human rights
movement, OutRage!, which lobbied for countries to support the
statement.

"To decriminalise homosexuality worldwide is a battle for human
rights," added Louis-Georges Tin, the President and founder of the
International Day Against Homophobia (IDAHO), which in 2006 initiated
the global campaign to end the criminalisation of same-sex
relationships and secured the support of dozens of international
public figures, ranging from Nobel Prize winners to writers, clergy,
actors, musicans and academics.

"IDAHO has worked hard for two years to promote this issue. For us,
this is a great achievement. I want to thank the many other people and
organisations who have worked with us since the beginning, and more
recently. I also want to remind everyone that ending the
criminalisation of same-sex love will be a long, hard battle. To love
is not a crime".

"IDAHO expresses its particular appreciation to the French Secretary
of State for human rights, Ms Rama Yade, for her role in organising
this statement and bringing it to the UN," said Mr Tin.

Mr Tatchell added:

"The original initiative for the universal decriminalisation of
homosexuality campaign came from the inspiring French black activist
and gay rights campaigner, Louis-Georges Tin, coordinator of the
International Day Against Homophobia (IDAHO). He lobbied the French
government, which agreed to take the lead in organising the
presentation of the statement at the UN.

"As well as IDAHO, I pay tribute to the contribution and lobbying of
Amnesty International; ARC International; Center for Women's Global
Leadership; COC Netherlands; Global Rights; Human Rights Watch;
International Committee for IDAHO (the International Day Against
Homophobia); International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission
(IGLHRC); International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and
Intersex Association (ILGA); International Service for Human Rights;
Pan Africa ILGA; and Public Services International.

"The UN statement goes much further than seeking the decriminalisation
of same-sex acts. It condemns all human rights violations based on
sexual orientation and gender identity, urges countries to protect the
human rights of LGBT people and to bring to justice those who violate
these rights, and calls for human rights defenders who oppose
homophobic and transphobic victimisation to be allowed to carry out
their advocacy and humanitarian work unimpeded.

"Although not binding on the member states, this UN statement of
principle has immense symbolic value, given the six decades in which
homophobic and transphobic persecution has been ignored by the UN
General Assembly.

"LGBT human rights have, however, been previously raised in other UN
forums and commissions. In the 1994 decision Toonen v Australia, the
UN Human Rights Committee ruled that sexual orientation is a status
protected against discrimination by the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights.

"Even today, not a single international human rights convention
explicitly acknowledges the human rights of LGBT people. The right to
physically love the person of one's choice is nowhere directly
enshrined in any global humanitarian law. No convention specifically
recognises sexual rights as human rights. None offer explicit
protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation or
gender identity.

"Some international human rights instruments have, of course, been
interpreted to include sexual orientation, but this is not the same as
the explicit prohibitions that exist concerning discrimination based
on race, nationality, gender and so on.

"Currently, 86 countries (nearly half the nations on Earth) still have
a total ban on male homosexuality and a smaller number also ban sex
between women. The penalties in these countries range from a few years
jail to life imprisonment. In at least seven countries or regions of
countries (all under Islamist jurisdiction), the sentence is death,
including Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Sudan, Mauritania and parts of
Nigeria and Pakistan," said Mr Tatchell.