8/01/2011

Ireland: New 'hidden history' of homosexuality

Friday 26 September 2008

A new "hidden history" book about homosexuality in Ireland has
provided "an invaluable template" for gay people and future
researchers examining the subject.

Jeffrey Dudgeon, a founding member of the Northern Ireland Gay
Rights Association, was referring to Terrible Queer Creatures -
Homosexuality in Irish History at the publication's launch in
Dublin last night.

"Just as the women's movement sparked an interest in the hidden
history of women, so it is argued that the hidden history of
homosexuality has its role to play in the onward struggle for
freedom from ignorance and prejudice," Mr Dudgeon said.

Author Brian Lacey (59) said he believed it was one of the first
comprehensive works on the topic to date and the professional
archaeologist said it was written because he had collected
information on the subject over the years.

Afterwards, he remarked that the book was the kind of tome he would
have liked to have read when he came out as a teenager in Dublin in
the late 1960s.

Mr Lacey's mother, Nora (78), was at the launch and said she had
read the manuscript before it was printed.

"Brian was the first person that I knew who was gay, but it never
changed our relationship. The book is very, very well written and I
am very proud of him," she said.

'Terrible Queer Creatures’: A history of homosexuality in Ireland
Brian Lacey


The ‘love that dare not speak its name’ was as common in Ireland throughout all stages of its history as it was in other parts of the world. Under certain cultural and historical conditions the expression of homosexuality in Ireland, as elsewhere, became more accepted or, at least, more visible than at any other times.

This book attempts to describe some of that visibility from early Ireland to the late 20th century. But it is clear that, like an iceberg, a far greater part of the story remains, and will almost certainly always remain, invisible. That is not just because homosexuality was often a deliberately concealed or secret thing. On the contrary, for some periods of our history its very absence from the record may in fact be a reflection of how ordinary, commonplace and unremarkable its expression was. Several writers on gay history, such as Martin Duberman, have alluded to the paradox that although we have, relatively speaking, only a tiny amount of historical documentation of heterosexual behaviour in the past, no one would claim that this is an accurate reflection of what actually took place. There is no reason to think that homosexual behaviour was any different.

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/61344.html




Slovenia: Two legal decisions on LGBT rights

The first case of gay asylum request in Slovenia was closed down in
July 2008. In the last two years lesbian section SKUC-LL and the
solicitor's office from Ljubljana supported a gay men couple (aged 27
and 33) from Kosovo in their struggle to be granted the asylum on the
ground of persecution because of their sexual orientation.

Their application for the asylum in Slovenia, submitted in June 2006,
was rejected by the Ministry of the Interior in February 2007. The
asylum seekers were ordered to leave Slovenia immediately. Due to
procedural mistakes committed by the Ministry during the asylum
procedure they brought charges first to the Administrative Court of
Republic of Slovenia and later on to the Supreme Court of Republic of
Slovenia. Both court decisions were in favor of the plaintiffs. The
Supreme Court ordered in May 2008 to the Ministry of the Interior to
restart the whole asylum procedure, according to the existing
standards of international protection of asylum seekers. The case was
closed down in July 2008 after both asylum seekers left Slovenia.
During their stay in Asylum Center in Ljubljana they suffered
homophobic harassment and violence of the co residents and the police.

In October 2007 a lesbian couple was treated discriminatory by the
personnel of a bar in Ljubljana. When they kissed each other they were
approached by the security person and told to leave the bar at once,
because it was a heterosexual bar, and not for lesbians. They reported
the incident to the police and submitted the complaint against the
security person to the State prosecutor. In June 2008 the State
prosecutor recognized the defendant was breaking the Article 141 of
the Penal Code (equality clause). To the proposal of the State
prosecutor the plaintiffs agreed upon the extra-court compromise with
the defendant, who is obliged to pay the fine - damages to the victims
according to the law.

Nepal gives formal recognition to third gender

18.9.2008.

KATHMANDU: A 21-year-old lesbian has become the first person in Nepal
to be officially recognised as a third gender person under the
Maoist-led new government, a move being hailed as a landmark for
sexual minorities in a country still dominated by a strong feudal
society.

Bishnu Adhikari, who was forced to leave her home in Pokhara town by
outraged relatives and neighbours, on Wednesday became the first
person in Nepal to be given an official identity card that described
her sex as "third gender" instead of the usual male and female
categories.

She was issued an official ID that gave her gender as "Third".

Naulo Bihani (New Dawn), a Nepali NGO that works for the rights of
gays and lesbians in Kaski district in central Nepal, said Adhikari
had applied for citizenship at the Kaski district administration
office asking for an ID that would identify her as third gender.

Adhikari, a human rights officer employed by the Blue Diamond Society
(BDS), the pioneer organisation in Nepal to champion the cause of gays
and lesbians, was inspired to ask for a third gender ID after Nepal's
first publicly gay lawmaker Sunil Babu Pant visited Pokhara about 10
days ago.

During his visit, Pant, who is also the founder of the BDS, gave a
public speech discussing the constitutional rights of third genders
and encouraging them to demand a citizenship certificate that truly
identified them.

The MP, who was nominated to the newly elected constituent assembly by
a minor communist party that is a partner in the ruling coalition,
said it would also be a test of the interim constitution promulgated
after the pro-democracy movement of 2006 that ensured equality for
every citizen.

Adhikari had a tough fight acquiring the ID she wanted.

Krishna Adhikari, regional coordinator at Naulo Bihani, said the
officials first rejected her demand saying she looked exactly like a
man and therefore should be issued an ID that described her as male.

However, after she consistently refused to accept it, saying that in
view of the new changes that had electrified Nepal her request should
also be heard, the officials went into a huddle among themselves and
then finally relented.

Adhikari's fight was made easier by the Supreme Court of Nepal that in
a landmark judgement last year said gays were "natural" people. It
directed the government to remove all discrimination against the
community and ensure for them the rights enjoyed by all other
citizens.

Last year, Chanda Musalman, a gay man who became a transgender,
dressing as a woman, wrested partial recognition for her community
when she was given an ID that described her gender as "both male and
female".

Brad Pitt donates $100,000 to gay marriage cause

Brad Pitt has donated $100,000 to fight California voters’ attempt to eliminate the rights of gay couples to marry. Pitt’s donation to the No on Prop 8  campaign is the largest single donation so far by a celebrity to the bid to defeat the anti-gay marriage California ballot measure in November, organizers said.
“Because no one has the right to deny another their life even though they disagree with it, because everyone has the right to live the life they so desire if it doesn’t harm another, and because discrimination has no place in America,  my vote will be for equality and against Proposition 8,” Pitt said in a statement.
The California Supreme Court struck down a ban on marriage in May but state voters will decide in a voter referendum in November whether to abolish those new rights.
Chad Griffin, political strategist for the No on 8 campaign, said he hoped Pitt’s contribution would encourage other celebrities to put their hands in their pockets. “The entertainment industry should view this contribution as a challenge,” Griffin said.
Many lesbian and gay couples marrying in Califronia have asked friends and relatives to donate to the campaign instead of buying wedding gifts.
Chat show host Ellen DeGeneres and actress Portia de Rossi married in Beverly Hills in August and former “Star Trek” crew member George Takei married his long time partner Brad Altman in September.

http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2008/09/18/brad-pitt-donates-100000-to-gay-marriage-cause/

Wedding of Ellen Degeneres and Portia de Rossi :)

Cardinal Newman's corpse dismembered

29 August 2008

"The Pope has strong-armed the Ministry of Justice to waive the law
and allow the exhumation and reburial of Cardinal John Henry Newman,"
according to human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell.

"The rarely granted special licence for exhumation was approved by the
Ministry of Justice burials department, headed by Catholic MP, Bridget
Prentice.

"It is entirely inappropriate that a Catholic Minister should have
overseen the granting of this exceptional legal dispensation. It will
inevitably lead to allegations that the Minister has, as a loyal
Catholic, shown favouritism.

"Justice Secretary Jack Straw MP has authorised the process that will
lead to the disinterment and dismemberment of Newman's body, contrary
to Newman's own repeatedly expressed wishes to remain buried in the
same grave as the man he loved, Father Ambrose St John. They have
remained buried side by side for over 100 years, since Newman's death
in 1890.

"The government is complicit in this act of grave-robbing, sacrilege
and desecration. Allowing the Catholic Church to over-ride Newman's
explicit instructions to his executors is truly shameful. The Pope
does not have the right to violate the Cardinal's wishes.

"The Catholic Church has admitted that it plans to break up parts of
Newman's body and display some of his bones as holy relics. The
Ministry of Justice accepted these plans at a meeting with Catholic
representatives in July," notes Mr Tatchell.

According to a report in The Catholic Herald on 15 August 2008:

'Officials from the Ministry of Justice have also given the go-ahead
for Catholic experts in holy objects to fly in from Italy and retrieve
"major relics" from the corpse after the coffin is opened for the
first time.
These will most likely be bones from his hands which will be shared
out between key churches in Britain - as well as one being sent to the
Vatican.
They will be placed in shrines so Catholic pilgrims can venerate
Cardinal Newman and pray for his intercession when he is made a saint.
A selection of minor relics - small fragments of bone and cloth -
will also be collected,' wrote The Catholic Herald reporter Simon
Caldwell.

These intentions were confirmed by Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor's
spokesperson, Austen Ivereigh. He admitted on BBC Radio Four's Sunday
Programme on 24 August that the Church is planning to destroy the
integrity of Cardinal Newman's bodily remains and distribute his bones
as 'holy relics.'

"The planned dismemberment and exploitation of the Cardinal's body is
ghoulish, sordid and distasteful," said Mr Tatchell.

"It is indecent, disrespectful, of doubtful legality and is definitely
incompatible with contemporary notions of respect for the dead."

"The Catholic Church will make a lot of money out of the vast number
of people who visit Newman's body in its new resting place. They will
rake in donations from vulnerable people who come seeking a miracle
cure, and make a tidy profit from selling Newman portraits, statues,
book and videos. The reburial and eventual sainthood of Newman will be
a gold mine for the Catholic Church, attracting pilgrims and money
from all over the world. This reburial aims to fill Catholic coffers."

"I suspect that most lay Catholics do not approve of the Vatican's
antics. Many are equally horrified; believing that these plans are
offensive and insensitive. None of us would want this to happen to our
deceased loved ones."

Norway: Islamic Council says imams should listen to homosexuals

August 28 2008

The Islamic Council of Norway doesn't want homosexuals, Muslim or not,
to be in the closet.

They live in Norway, a democratic country, and they are free to come
out, says Senaid Kobilica of the Islamic council of Norway to
Dagsavisen. He stresses that nobody should live in fear and points to
violent incidents where homosexuals were beaten due to the sexual
inclination.

"Most of all they need somebody to speak with. Imams must therefore be
open to listen to homosexual Muslims. We recommend that everybody
respect homosexuals and lesbians", says Kobilica.

The Islamic Council is an umbrella organization for the Islamic faith
societies and organizations in Norway. It represents close to 70,000
Norwegian Muslims. [ed: out of an estimated 120,000-150,000]

By saying imams should listen to homosexual Muslims, Kobilica opens
the door for homosexual Muslims. But the head of the Islamic Council
thinks it's incompatible to be a homosexual and a believing Muslim.

"It isn't possible to live homosexually and at the same time say that
one practices Islam. These are two incompatible things."

- Isn't is also an interpretation of Islam, that one can't be an
homosexual and a believing Muslim?

"No. Homosexuality goes against what Islam stands for, and therefore
it can't be combined."

- How should the imams treat homosexual Muslims?

"The imams should listen to homosexuals and to their concerns. But
naturally we will also inform them about Islamic thought and how it
relates to homosexuality."

- Can homosexuality be cured?

"I don't want to speak of curing or that homosexuality is an illness.
As an imam I will note that every Muslim should live in conformity to
basic Islamic principles."

Earlier this week the Islamic Council of Norway's met with SV's
homo-network, where they spoke of homosexual Muslims in Norway. This
is the first time the Islamic Council met with homosexual
representatives to debate on this issue.

Two and half weeks ago the Children and Equality Minister, Anniken
Huitfeldt, criticized the Islamic Council for not rejecting the death
sentence against homosexuals. (..)

"We stress that the Islamic Council of Norway rejects the death
sentence for homosexuals in Norway, but we don't want to go into
legislation in other countries," says Kobilica.

But Norwegian Muslims don't need to reject the death sentence for
homosexuals outside Norway?

"As said the Islamic Council can't get involved in how other countries
are run."

Senaid, you had earlier said that you can count homosexual Muslims on
one hand. Do you still think that?

"He he. No, I've heard much about it, and it was certainly not so
clever of me," answers Kobilica.

Basim Ghozlan, head of the Islamic Association, says he will naturally
listen to homosexual Muslims who come to him.

"But until now I haven't seen anybody. If they come to me, we can talk
about anything. I think they should live the way they think is right,"
says Ghozlan.

http://www.dagsavisen.no/innenriks/article365805.ece

Vatican orders Cardinal Newman to be parted from priest friend in shared grave

25 August 2008

The Catholic Church is under growing pressure to abandon the "homophobic" exhumation and reburial of the body of one its most famous cardinals, in defiance of his wish to lie for eternity next to the man he loved.

Gay rights campaigners have accused the Vatican – which has ordered the disinterment in the first step towards beatification – of attempting to cover up the sexuality of Cardinal John Henry Newman, who died in 1890.

Opposition to the reburial among some British Roman Catholics has been bolstered by a new poll organised by The Church Times which shows that a majority of Anglicans are now against the separation of Cardinal Newman, a former Anglican clergyman, and Father Ambrose St John who lived together as "husband and wife" for most of their late adult lives.

Yesterday, the gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell told The Independent: "The Vatican's decision to move Cardinal Newman's body from its resting place is an act of grave robbery and religious desecration. It violates Newman's repeated wish to be buried for eternity with his life-long partner Ambrose St John.

"They have been together for more than 100 years and the Vatican wants to disturb that peace to cover up the fact that Cardinal Newman loved a man. It's shameful, dishonourable betrayal of Newman by the gay-hating Catholic Church."

The Church Times' poll found that 80 per cent of responders were opposed to the Vatican's decision to move Newman's body.

But Austen Ivereigh, former advisor to Cardinal Cormac-Murphy O'Connor, the head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, told BBC Radio 4's Sunday programme yesterday that Mr Tatchell's criticism was a nonsense. Mr Ivereigh said the reburial was "part of the process to the journey towards canonisation" so his remains can be taken to a suitable city to allow pilgrims "to venerate the saint to be". He added: "I don't think anyone disputes that Cardinal Newman deeply loved Ambrose St John. He did say after St John died that the grief is comparable to a husband losing a wife or wife losing a husband, but he did not mean that the relationship with Ambrose St John was a marriage like a gay relationship. It is simply wrong to read back from today's categories into the Victorian periods when these very intense, passionate, but totally celibate relationships in Oxford and among the Anglocatholic community were very common."

Cardinal Newman and Ambrose St John share a memorial stone and are buried side by side in the same grave in Rednal, Worcestershire. Cardinal Newman wrote shortly before his death: "I wish, with all my heart, to be buried in Father Ambrose St John's grave – and I give this as my last, my imperative will."

On their gravestone is a Latin inscription, "there from the shadow and images into the truth", which many people believe is a posthumous coming out.

The Ministry of Justice has granted a licence for the removal of the Cardinal's remains into a sarcophagus to stand opposite the Holy Souls Altar in the Birmingham Oratory. Pope Benedict is likely to declare Cardinal Newman as blessed in November, which could lead to canonisation.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/plan-to-exhume-cardinal-is-homophobic-907797.html

Berlin Mayor Condemns Attack on Gay Memorial

08/18/2008

Berlin's memorial to the thousands of homosexuals persecuted and killed by
the Nazis was damaged over the weekend, less than three months after its
unveiling. Berlin Mayor Klaus Wowereit condemned the attack and joined a
demonstration at the site on Monday.

Visitors inspect damage done to the monument to homosexuals persecuted by
the Nazis in Berlin.
The mayor of Berlin, Klaus Wowereit, condemned an attack that damaged the
city's monument to homosexuals (more...)persecuted by the Nazis and joined a
demonstration at the scene on Monday afternoon.

"An attack against this memorial is clearly directed against homosexuals --
that can be said without waiting for further police investigations. We must
show our condemnation of this act of intolerance and homophobia," said
Wowereit, who is himself openly gay.

A viewing window in the concrete monument through which a video of two men
kissing can be seen was smashed in the attack. The damage was reported by a
passerby on Saturday, police said, adding that they had launched an
investigation.

Germany's Association of Lesbians and Gays said in a statement: "Everything
suggests that this attack was motivated by a hatred of homosexuals."

"The attack shows in a drastic way how necessary this monument is. Hostility
to homosexuals remains virulent. The kissing scene shown in the monument
evidently hit the mark. Even in a democratic society there are people who
can't stand the sight of men kissing in public."

The monument was unveiled at a ceremony on May 27 and commemorates the
thousands of homosexual men who died in concentration camps because of Nazi
laws persecuting them for their sexual persuasion.

more at : 
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,572829,00.html

Spies urged to come in from the closet

August 17, 2008

The intelligence service MI5 has teamed up with Britain’s leading gay lobby group to recruit more homosexuals and to encourage spies to be open about their sexuality.
    MI5, which targets home-grown terrorists and foreign spies, has hired Stonewall to advise on how it can attract a broader range of applicants.
    Until the early 1990s, gays were barred from sensitive government jobs because of fears that they would be vulnerable to blackmail.  The ban followed revelations about the notorious Cambridge spy ring, the 1950s group of Cambridge graduates who worked in the intelligence service.  Two of the ringleaders, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt, were both gay.
    This year MI5 will appear in Stonewall’s graduate recruitment guide, which lists gay-friendly employers.
    Since the London Underground bombings on July 7, 2005, MI5 has been expanding rapidly.  Staff numbers are expected to hit 3,500 by the end of the year, up from 1,500 in 2001.
    The drive to recruit British Muslims and speakers of Asian languages has been well reported, but MI5’s targeting of the gay community will come as something of a surprise.
    Ben Summerskill, director of Stonewall, said: “I am optimistic that in 10 to 15 years their [MI5’s] employment profile will look very much like modern Britain.  There is no reason why there shouldn’t be a lesbian or gay director-general.”
    Explaining why MI5 might wish to recruit from the gay community, he added: “People from all minority communities do have experience of getting on with people who are different and of fitting in.
    “They are also good at doing these things in a way that is not conspicuous.”  A Whitehall source confirmed that MI5 was working closely with Stonewall, saying: “The service seeks to reflect the broad range of UK society which it serves.”
    One of Stonewall’s first achievements has been to set up a gay and lesbian “network” at MI5 to work with spy chiefs on policy.  Stonewall, which was paid for its work, has also been advising on how to create a working environment where gay officers can feel comfortable about “coming out”.
    In the past homosexual staff were nervous about revealing their sexual orientation to colleagues because it might lead to claims that they had lied to recruiters when they joined.
    The plan to bring Stonewall into MI5’s normally insular headquarters on London’s Millbank was approved by Jonathan Evans, who became director-general last year.  By coincidence Evans and Summerskill attended the same public school, Sevenoaks in Kent.

There is little more perverse than the Mafia's sexual morality

Irish Times, Saturday 9 August 2008

Italy - The case of a mobster gang-raped to punish him for being gay shines a light on Mafia morals, writes Paddy Agnew

Cosa Nostra does not like a gay. Indeed, Cosa Nostra tends to have some very traditional, if not to say prudish views on sexuality in general. The Sicilian Mafia might be strong on drug trafficking, racketeering, extortion and many other illegal activities but when it comes to sexuality, the Sicilian godfathers opt for their own peculiar version of the moral high ground.


Sicilian lawyer Antonio Fiumefreddo is the person to have shed the most recent light on one of the least documented realities of the murky world of Cosa Nostra. In a YouTube interview with Swiss journalist and TV personality Klaus Davi, he recounted the story of "Giovanni", a 20-year-old mobster serving time in Catania's Piazza Lanza prison.


Giovanni made the mistake of letting it be known that he likes to write poetry. Given also that the "men of honour" in his "family" noticed Giovanni's allegedly effeminate manner, he was soon seen as a less than "honourable" figure. According to lawyer Fiumefreddo, they decided to punish Giovanni, offering him the following explanation: "Only a queer would write poetry and for that reason you deserve to be sodomised."


And so it was. Giovanni was so brutally gang-raped by eight members of his family that he later required eight stitches to his anus. The incident in question took place two years ago but, surprise, surprise, no action was taken against Giovanni's attackers. Often, says Fiumefreddo, such incidents merit nothing more than an internal notification.


There is nothing new about the fact that episodes of prison violence remain behind closed prison gates. Nor, unfortunately, is this phenomenon limited to Sicily. What is interesting about Giovanni's case is the virulent homophobia expressed by Cosa Nostra. The point about the Sicilian Mob is that they strongly disapprove of any form of heterosexual deviance or dalliance while homosexual activity is totally off their "moral" radar.


To speak of "morality" in relation to hardened, violent killers and criminals might seem totally inappropriate. Yet, just listen to this exchange back in 1993, when the "Boss of Bosses" Toto Riina, who had been arrested earlier that year, was brought face to face in court with one of the most important Mafia godfathers ever to turn state's witness, Tommaso Buscetta.


As soon as the hearing started, Toto Riina raised an objection with the judge, making reference to the fact that Buscetta had had two wives and two families.


"Signor Presidente, I won't talk with someone of such low morality. My grandfather was widowed and left with five children at the age of 40 and yet he never looked for another wife. My mother was a widow from the age of 36. In our town, Corleone, we all live in a morally correct manner . . ."


An outraged Buscetta was not to be intimidated, pointing out that Riina's moral vision of the world did not seem to object to murder. "From what pulpit is he preaching, he of all people? He accuses me about women, about having had two wives, he who had my sons and many of my closest relatives killed, he who sent many, many innocent people to their deaths."


That exchange, which took place in the special high-security "aula-bunker" of Palermo's Ucciardone prison, would seem to substantiate the view that Cosa Nostra sets much store by "correct" sexual behaviour.


In other words, a real "man of honour" does not betray his wife, does not get divorced, does not frequent prostitutes and does not hassle the women of other men of honour. Above all, a real man of honour cannot be homosexual.


Palermo-based state investigator Antonio Ingroia confirms the homophobic line of Cosa Nostra, telling Klaus Davi in a separate interview: "There are plenty of gay godfathers but they hide it and they certainly don't 'come out' and for a simple reason - they are frightened of being put out of the organisation.


"If being gay still represents a taboo in Italian society at large, you can just imagine how it is perceived in an archaic society such as Cosa Nostra."


Palermo-based psychologist Girolamo Lo Verso, in his book, The Mafia Mind, sheds further light on the Cosa Nostra "moral code". In an interview with "C", a Mafioso turned state's witness, Lo Verso asks the mobster about Mafia sexuality: "They [the godfathers] always tell you that you must respect your wife, where respect also means respect her in bed and they tell you never to do certain things with your wife, the sort of things you do with a prostitute you never do them with a wife."


Irish TV audiences have long since become familiar with the celebrated (and not always flattering) version of the Mob, presented by the immensely successful series, The Sopranos.


Curiously, investigator Ingroia feels that the series, if broadcast in Italy, would do much to undermine the backward Cosa Nostra mentality, and not just in relation to sexuality: "That is a series which jeers the Mafia rather than celebrating it".


Mind you, for men like Ingroia, the Mafia's sexual tastes are the least of his problems. He estimates that 33 per cent of the money that passes through Italian banks today derives from organised crime, "directly or indirectly".


He would doubtless agree with Confesercenti, the association of small businesses, which last October issued a report claiming that "Mafia Inc" is Italy's biggest company, with an estimated annual turnover of €90 billion, or 7 per cent of Italian GDP.


Such a turnover requires serious administration, so much so that between 1999 and 2003, organised crime killed 666 people in Italy (source: Eurispes Rapporto Italia 2004).


And these guys want to take the moral high ground on sex?

Anti-gay bigotry spans European cultures

06.08.2008

In front of the parliament in Stockholm - the city hosting the 10-day EuroPride 2008 festival for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, the rainbow flag could be seen fluttering from buses, theatres and public buildings under the near-tropical sun which has blessed the Swedish capital this summer.

There are no homophobia-free zones in Europe: Police guard the EuroPride 2008 march through Stockholm (Photo: Stockholm Pride, Kari Lind)
Swedes pride themselves on being the most gay-friendly society in Europe, while politicians and businesses compete to cash in on gay goodwill credit. Pink money is as good as any money, and the LGBT-crowds from near and far are not fussy about their patrons.
Sponsors for the festival - which ended on 3 August - ranged from the Stockholm taxi company and city theatres to a cigarette brand and a multi-international oil company. The Swedish Lutheran church hosted a kindergarden for children of gay parents. Volvo and IBM held seminars on how to prevent homophobia at work.
"For one little week of the year, homosexuality seems mainstream, almost dull. I come out from the grocery store and I see gay couples holding hands everywhere," Anna, a lesbian writer and mother of two, told Euobserver.
Anna said she is lucky: her two boys have never been teased at school, something which she thinks is still unusual, even in Sweden. But not everyone is so lucky.
The launch of Europride 2008 was marked by the attempted murder of a homosexual couple strolling peacefully in a quiet Stockholm street on the night of 28 July. The assailants grunted homophobic insults, drew out knives and stabbed one of the couple in the stomach several times. Police later arrested three teenagers.
From countries all over Europe there are frequent reports of violent, homophobic attacks and, in many cases, of the police ignoring or silently encouraging abuse.
Moldovan police
"We know that there were 15 police cars parked next to the square where we were attacked by a lynch mob of hundreds, but they never came to our rescue," Moldovan group GenderDoc-M activist Dana Cotici said at a rights seminar in the Swedish parliament, still trembling as she recounted an incident in Chisinau in May.
Some sixty members and sympathizers of GenderDoc-M, the only support group for gay rights in Moldova, had set out to march in support of fresh anti-discrimination legislation, handing out leaflets, EU-flags and rainbow balloons.
Their bus was suddenly surrounded by groups of masked men, many wearing military-type outfits, in the style of the country's neo-fascist movement the New Right. Others belonged to extremist religious groups, slamming the bus windows and shouting "Let's get them out and beat them up!"
"I have never been so scared in my whole life," Ms Cotici said. When she called the police emergency line, they said "Yes, we know you are [being]attacked, what do you want us to do about it?"
"The Moldovan government is eager to come closer to European standards, and EU officials in our country push the issue again and again and again. Thank you Europe."
Gay Turkey in court
"The best thing that ever happened to us was when they closed us down," Emrezan Ozen from the Turkish LGBT-rights group Lambda-Istanbul, said at the Stockholm seminar.
Last year an Istanbul court prosecuted Lambda-Istanbul on the grounds that the objective of the organisation is "against law and morality." The courts declined to define "morality" or address the issue that homosexuality is legal in Turkey, but the final verdict said Lambda-Istanbul threatened children's rights.
"They basically said we would come and take children and turn them into gays," Mr Ozen explained, with the incident bringing worldwide publicity for his group.
"We have received support from everywhere, from Europe, from international human rights groups. And we now have a pilot case to take to the Turkish constitutional court. They know that Brussels is watching," he said.
Mr Ozen underlined that the court decision has nothing to with Turkey's predominantly Muslim society. "The state of Turkey, its institutions and judicial system, is secular, secular to the point of being ridiculous."
Pride and prejudice in Lithuania
In Lithuania, bus drivers arriving to work in May last year refused to drive vehicles carrying LGBT posters with rainbow flags, while the Mayor of Vilnius refused to let a European Year of Equal Opportunities for All campaign truck tour the city.
"In order to understand why Lithuania is the most homophobic country in the European Union, you must remember that during the 50 years of Russian invasion, citizens of the Soviet Union lived according to certain dogmas: there were no criminals, no disabled people and no homosexuals in the Soviet Union," said Marija Ausrine Pavilioniene, an MP in Vilnius.
"To understand and to accept are two different things," she added, noting that Lithuania has not lived up to human rights promises made when joining the EU in 2004.
Lithuanian religious figures, journalists and politicians freely make homophobic comments in the media, while police are notorious for standing by when hate groups attack gay rights gatherings.
According to gay rights supporters, authorities frequently cite "security" concerns to create obstacles for demonstrations.
European diet
"Negotiating with the new EU member states was like the first time I had dinner with my wife's parents. You tip-toe around issues, you are nervous and afraid to step on any sore toes, said Hakan Jonsson, the Swedish state secretary for European affairs, who negotiated the 2004 enlargement round for Sweden.
"Only, this dinner lasted for five years."
According to Mr Jonsson, civil servants and politicians were reluctant to open the "Pandora's box" of what actually constitutes "human rights," as mentioned in the EU treaties and directives.
Religious feelings, public opinion and the unwillingness to point fingers at problems in the EU candidate countries - problems often mirrored in the 15 ‘old' member states - discouraged frank debate.
But Mr Jonsson praised progress since 2004, highlighting a recently proposed EU directive that would put discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation on an equal footing with race, gender and disability.
The European Commission last month also proposed a bill to ensure equal treatment in public services such as health care, social security and education, when buying products or making use of commercial services.
The proposal would, for instance, permit a tenant to sue a landlord for refusing to rent an apartment because she was black, or gay.
The French EU presidency has said the discrimination directive is a priority, with Paris keen to rubber stamp a deal at the European summit in December.
Stockholm party time
Back at EuroPride 2008 in Stockholm, a colourful crowd lined the protest parade in the city centre. Nearly half a million onlookers craned their necks to see the passing floats draped in rainbow flags and pumping out loud music.
This year, the Stockholm fire brigade - portrayed by comedians as the last bastion for Swedish men suffering from chronic masculinity hubris – made its Pride debut.
A fire engine and a smiling, fully uniformed fire brigade phalanx appeared next to police, ambulance drivers and coastguard crews in the "112 section" - the emergency phone number section - of the parade.
"We are bad at pluralism in the fire brigade," fire chief Jan Wisen said, encouraging people among his 400-strong team to come out of the closet.
"Statistically, it is not plausible that none of them are gay. Sadly, the fact that none has come out signals that they feel the fire brigade environment is not accommodating to gays, and we have to change that."

http://euobserver.com/879/26567

"The Irish Times" (Dublin): "Cultures clash in church row over gay rights"

Tue, Aug 05, 2008

RITE&REASON: The controversy within the Anglican communion over same-sex issues, considered again at the recently concluded Lambeth Conference, and concern about human rights in China in the context of the Olympic Games, throw up an awkward question.
    To what extent is the promotion of human rights a western colonial exercise?
    To what extent are so-called "self-evident truths" arising from the Judeo-Christian tradition - still dominant as a pattern of thinking in the West if not any more where religious practice is concerned - simply by-products of a particularly successful culture rather than being "truths" that genuinely have the universal application claimed?
    You might ask the same of democracy, still so new where so many of our fellow EU countries are concerned.  It remains a novel political system for most countries in eastern Europe and for such western European countries as Spain and Portugal, as well as Greece farther east.
    Yet we demand that it be the political system that should operate everywhere, including in venerable cultures that are to be found throughout the Middle East and in China, a country that had an ancient civilisation of great sophistication when we still lived in mud huts.
    These questions have been prompted by claims from some African Anglicans, bishops included, that acknowledgment of gay rights and of active homosexuals as clergy and bishops, as well as the blessing of same-sex relationships, are an attempt by the West to impose alien values on them.
    In some of their cultures homosexuality is so far below the taboo line that it has no acknowledged existence.  It is utterly, unimaginably alien.  So much so that, as one African bishop recalled at the Lambeth Conference recently, when your church is referred to locally as "the gay Church" it is deeply pejorative and humiliating.
    Such was that bishop's distress that it prompted an American counterpart, who approves of gay bishops, etc. [who???], to weep and apologise wholeheartedly for the distress his Episcopal church had caused their African colleagues.
    It illustrated something of the meeting of hearts that occurred at Lambeth, even if there was no great meeting of minds.
    It was sobering for many there to experience so vividly how one person's human right can be so painfully another's taboo.  It exposed a deep cultural chasm, which is not peculiar to Anglicanism.
    But reflection on the experiences of many at the Lambeth Conference in recent weeks is also to realise just how young and how fragile is the concept of the ineffable dignity of the person.
    It is to be remembered how small the individual remains before history and culture.
    African Anglicans, however, were on surer ground when they questioned the situation whereby their titular head, the Archbishop of Canterbury, is appointed by the British government.  There, indeed, they do have a point when they shout "colonialism!"
    But their resorting to the Bible, and that of others of like mind in the West, when explaining their opposition to homosexuality becomes threadbare on investigation.  There are seven instances where it is thought homosexuality may be being condemned biblically.  None is absolutely clear and none is from Jesus.
    Then there are those practices such as slavery that were never condemned in the Bible - should slavery be brought back?  Or usury - the payment of interest on loans - which was.  Yet, when was the last time you heard a church condemn banks?
    You could go on.  It means the Bible alone is not enough and must be read in the context of the revelations of the day.
    Science is the medium through which that revelation speaks most clearly to this age and the study of human biology and psychology increasingly underpins the objective reality of homosexuality as a valid orientation.
    This is what western Anglicans particularly have been wrestling with in recent recent decades, not least the Church of Ireland.
    Its House of Bishops holds four positions on the subject.  These:
        (i) reject homosexual practice of any kind;
        (ii) have a more sympathetic attitude to homosexuality, but would not at present permit radical change;
        (iii) hold that a permanent and committed same-gender relationship . . . cannot be dismissed . . . as intrinsically disordered; and
        (iv) hold that the time has arrived for a change in the church's traditional position.
    Clearly it is a house where there are differences, but it is not divided against itself.

Gay blood hearing starts Thursday

Tuesday August 5th, 2008

GROUNDBREAKING GAY BLOOD BAN CASE STARTS THURSDAY

The first full hearing in a groundbreaking gay blood ban case begins in Hobart this Thursday before the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Tribunal.

The case was lodged in 2005 by Launceston gay man, Michael Cain, after he was refused the opportunity to give blood at the Launceston blood collection centre because he indicated he was in a sexual relationship with another man.

Mr Cain said "my case is simply that potential donors should be screened for the safety of their sexual activity rather than the gender of their sexual partner."

"I am looking forward to this important issue finally having its day in court"

Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group spokesperson, Rodney Croome, also welcomed the Tribunal hearing.

"In most western countries improvements to blood testing has sparked reviews of outdated policies banning gay blood donation.

"My hope is that this case will open the eyes of the Australian Red Cross to an important global reform movement."

On Thursday, counsel for Mr Cain and the Red Cross Society will give their opening addresses. 

Beginning on the following Tuesday, evidence will be given by expert witnesses.

Czech Republic

4 August 2008

The number of same-sex couples who conclude registered
partnership in the Czech Republic has declined since the boom in 2006 when
the respective law took effect, the daily Pravo wrote Friday, referring to
its poll at birth registry offices.

The law on registered partnership of gay and lesbian couples has been valid
since July 1, 2006. In the same year 235 couples entered into registered
partnership in the 10-million Czech Republic.

During the first half of this year, it was only 105 couples, according to
data from 14 birth registries, Pravo writes.

"In 2006 we registered 26 couples, during the whole 2007 it was also 26, and
this year we have so far registered 10 couples," a clerk, from the birth
registry in Kladno, central Bohemia, told Pravo.

The situation in other localities is similar, the paper adds.

The only exception is Karlovy Vary, west Bohemia, where the number of
registered same-sex couples has increased.

In 2006, two couples were registered, last year it was eight, and this years
ten couples have entered registered partnership in Karlovy Vary.

The highest number of couples concluded registered partnership in the
capital of Prague.

Activist Jiri Hromada, former chairman of the Czech Gay Initiative, says the
current decreasing figures only prove that he situation has stabilised.

"I cannot see a decline. It has stabilised after the boom," Hromada told
Pravo.

He added that the figures in the Czech Republic corresponded to the
situation in the Netherlands and Germany.

Gays have entered into registered partnership more often than lesbians in
the Czech Republic. Nine registered couples have already been divorced,
Pravo writes.

Castration law for Swedish transgenders

2 Aug 08

A new proposal to introduce castration as a prerequisite for those
undergoing gender reassignment surgery in Sweden has been met with outrage
by a leading gay and transgender rights organization.

Today, those undergoing gender reassignment surgery in order to achieve sex
change usually complement their surgery with hormone treatment.

A side-effect of the hormone treatment is natural sterilization.

However, hormone treatments may be broken off, whether permanently or
short-term, allowing for the possibility of pregnancy, as was the case of a
British transgender “man” who got pregnant this year.

The new legislation would prevent a pregnancy altogether by making
castration obligatory – testicles or ovaries would be taken out in an
operation.

The Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights
(RFSL) and several patient associations have given a firm thumbs down for
obligatory castration.

RFSL has criticized the move as downright discriminatory and insulting.

http://www.thelocal.se/13448/